Spiffy, thanks for the thoughts and the pic -
I understand that some of the larger CAT equipment uses motor oil in its hydraulic systems, so I don't think there is anything wrong with it. Not sure how they go about the non-foaming issue, maybe they add additives?
I guess you arent putting just any old oil in yours, do PT spec oil for it?
So you have the same pump for steering that you use for your loader? Does that mean that when the steering hits the relief the loader stops?
I weighed up the options for using the same pump for accessories and steering. In the end decided to spend $300 more and get a separate pump. Not too sure at this point if it was worth it.
You are exactly right on your analysis of the fixed disp pump with a valve and the variable disp pump. I think the pedal will work more like a power pedal than an accelerator pedal. Press the pedal more and the pressure to the motors increases. If the pressure is more than is needed to move then you go faster. It might be weird to drive, but hopefully it'll work. Variable disp pumps were big money, $2k for something that might have worked.
Thats the part that I am most intrigued to test, this project is really an experiment every step of the way. My drive pump is 68l/min (18gal/min) and I'm hoping the tank will be able to cool that flow. In all probability I wont be running all full engine speed, so the flow will be far less. I'm only running about 1500psi full pressure too.
Using your calculation, at full speed and pressure I will be about on the money with my 31HP engine. Adding a hydraulic PTO would probably be too much, its an option for down the line though.
The wheels on each axle are in parallel to allow for different speeds when turning. The 2 axles are in series. As you say, the diverters just replace a T in the lines.
Thanks for your posts, its handy to be able to compare my system to a proven design, interesting analysis too.