Mahindra has taken this Chinese engineered tractor tested it for 2 plus years, and has went back to the drawing board 200 plus times. I believe 226 to be exact. Thus this tractor has become a Mahindra engineered tractor built in a Mahindra owned, operated, and managed plant located in The Peoples Republic of China. I believe you will be surprised with this tractors performance and I know there is a market for this tractor in this country. People are always stopping looking at the Mahindra's thinking they can buy them for what the present Chinese made tractors are going for. The 2525 will be competitively priced with the Chinese competition and you get a 2 year warranty, parts and service support, a good dealer network, and Mahindra low rate financing.
Hi Galen - As I've said before, I have nothing but respect for the Mahindra dealers that post on-line here and elsewhere. You
ARE our best source of information...
technical, operational and otherwise... and I appreciate it greatly. But I must respectfully make the following points:
Of course there is a market for a cheapie tractor. I'm sure there is a market for an $7,000 tractor... even more for a $5,000 tractor... even more for a $3,000 tractor... etc. Tell me of market research anywhere that doesn't show demand for a product at 3/4 or 1/2 of the going price? I'm glad you will have more
bottom feeder sales... but I am looking at this from the perspective of a current owner and likely future buyer. I am seeing little positive beyond cheap initial price from Mahindra's new "Go Chinese, Go downscale, Go cheap" focus.
I am also not favorable impressed by the number of times M&M (China) has had to go "
back to the drawing board" to get this cheap new Chinese tractor to work. I see that as a negative... very telling of the materials and manufacturing quality problems in China... not as a positive.
I am also baffled at why M&M cannot produce a competitive
low-end of the market tractor in India. This makes no sense to me. I would fully understand M&M's desire to penetrate the Chinese tractor market in a much bigger way. That makes perfect sense. But building cheap tractors in China for sale in the American market seems to undercut Mahindra's growing reputation here for high quality comensurate with high value. To me, this is a marketing disaster in the making. Just look at TYM's "Made in China" tractor experiment/fiasco.
But most importantly, I am
NOT saying to M&M and M-USA: don't ever bring this cheapie, downscale, Chinese tractor to these shores. I
am saying: a) Please give this tractor some serious
real world field time far, far away from the American marketplace... and b) Please market it under a
different brand name for at least the first 5 years. Let the damn thing prove itself before you let it wear the Mahindra nameplate.
Sears does it with Craftsman (USA) and Companion (cheap China junk). Whirlpool did it with Whirlpool and Roper. Tire manufacturers all do it all the time. Why degrade the Mahindra nameplate at this point in time when it is making good headway in the premium tractor sector? Why sink to the level of Jinma just to make a few low-end bucks? I say let the new Chinese tractor
earn that label. Keep the premium quality Indian, Japanese and Korean tractors separate from the Chinese tractor in the minds of buyers or risk the collapse of the current loyal Mahindra following.
Mahindra really needs to figure out what it wants to be in this American marketplace. A high reputation, high quality, high value alternative to the Big 3 brands? Or competition for the likes of Jinma?
Dougster